I'm quite the sucker for the story of the obscure individual who flies below the radar and, in the midst of their anonymity, does something that catches everyone's attention. So it took me all of a few seconds to fall in love with this NPR story.
See, it's about two things that, more than likely, I will never experience. On seemingly opposite ends of the spectrum, nonetheless. On one end it's about $4 million. I just can't get a grasp on that kind of money, you know? Heck, I just finished paying the monthly bills last night and got that dense feeling in the pit of my stomach when I glanced at the remaining amount in the checkbook. Yuck. We're trying to figure out how to purchase a second car. Four mil would go a long way in helping us do that - four million that I don't (and probably never will) have. Because, you know, that is a friggin' TON of money.
On the other end of the spectrum, this NPR story is about homelessness, something else I can't fathom. For all my years I've never had to worry about whether I'd have a roof over my head. Well, I take that back. There was a time about fifteen years ago when I was dating this girl whose father happened to be my landlord. Let me strongly advise all of you: never date your landlord's offspring. Nothing good can come from it. When I broke up with her (which I had to do, long story) I seriously thought I was going to wake up the following morning and find an eviction notice plastered to my door. That's if he didn't come in on his own and kick me out himself. The guy was also my barber, too. True story; I kid you not.
In all seriousness, I'm typing this blog as I'm sitting quite comfortably in my two-story, brick 2200-square foot home in Mayberry. It's muggy and threatening rain outside, but it's 68 degrees and dry in here. We just had the outside trim painted and the porch re-screened. We are truly blessed. The closest I ever get to homelessness is paying a visit to our local shelter in town or speaking with the man who stops by the church with eviction notice in hand (which he got because he's out of money, not because he broke up with his landlord's daughter). Every day of my life I'm pretty much shielded from the roughly 3 million people in our country who have no place to call home (according to this study).
So the only thing I have in common with $4 million and homelessness is that I have very little in common with them. I'm going to assume that the vast majority of you are with me on this, as the two rarely go hand-in-hand. Unless, by chance, your name is Richard Walters.
Which brings us to the aforementioned NPR story. See, Richard Walters, an honors Purdue grad and Marine, had his feet planted firmly at both ends of the spectrum. As the NPR story chronicles, this man died two years ago as a homeless man who slept on the grounds of a local senior center. He also left behind an estate of $4 million, all donated to various charities (including, as it turns out, NPR).
$4 million. Homeless. Does not compute.
Frankly, it's amazing to me that this story is amazing to me. And if I'm honest with myself, I think this says a lot about our culture and the preconceptions we typically make. Specifically: homeless people must not have any money, and millionaires must live in fancy homes. I have to be careful about this; we all do. Because none of us know the full story of anyone unless we actually take time to get to know them; to know where they're coming from and where they're heading then. And even then we're only hitting the tip of the iceberg.
Here's my point: take a look at this picture to the left. Go ahead, look at it. Now - say you're strolling downtown one weekday afternoon and see this guy at the corner. What are your initial thoughts? Be honest now. Is he there because he got laid off from the factory down the street that closed? Or is he simply lazy and playing the system? Does he have some mental illness? Or is he in his dire situation because of a string of bad luck that would knock any of us off our feet? Most importantly, how do our assumptions about him affect our response to him - do we approach him to offer help, or do we cross the street and walk on the other side?
Here's another one: imagine you're cruising through the posh part of town and turn at the stop sign (which is color-coordinated with all the other signs in the development) to see this. Quick, what are your first musings? Do you try to guess what company its owner is CEO of, and whether your raided 401-K was used to finance it? Is there a brand new, fully-loaded Lexus parked in one of its three garages? And how many people have full-time jobs simply to keep up the appearance of this monstrosity?
The harsh truth of all of this, of course, is that we really don't know the answer to any of these things. But that doesn't stop our assumptions from making sense to us. People like Richard Walters, however, do not. People who refuse to fall in line with our stereotypes seem strangely odd, a novelty that must be seen like that miniature horse or smallest woman at the county fair.
I'm not saying Walters was right in what he did. Personally I think the guy was crazy to not at least rent a one-bedroom and some basic furniture, you know? But that's the thing: it's not really an issue of right and wrong. Walters did what he did, and we're still talking about him two years after his death because of it. Well, at least NPR and I are.
Here's a radical idea: maybe guys like this are the ones who really "get it" more than the rest of us. Maybe we're the crazy ones for making the assumptions and choices we sometimes do. And maybe this is a truth that will take us a long, long time to reconcile. Ah, the joys of the journey!
(but seriously, though, never date the landlord's daughter. I'm just saying...)







Recent Comments